Category: Projects

  • Mining Structures Chutes

    This project was detailed a while before. However I am posting this now

    We have detailed transfer structure, conveyors, Chutes, Vibrating Grizzlys on this particular projects. These Items are typical for mining projects. There is a fair bit of care required when it comes to bracing to avoid weld clash.

    At Tek1, it is our standard practice to check all handrails , stairs, ramps ladder to relevant standard. We do not simply go by the Engineer Architect drawings. We check whether it will comply.

    Actually, once can simply tell us, put a stair here, give us the heights and spacing available, we could detail a stair for you, which will comply to Australian standards (AS1657 or AS1428 as the case may be)

    This video show cases a few elements of the mining structure.

  • 14 RIDGEWAY AVENUE, KEW

    14 RIDGEWAY AVENUE, KEW

    Author: RAJ (Arokiaraj Arputharaj), an expert in simplified structures for residential projects, also specializes in structural steel drafting.

    Simple to fabricate and easy to install, is the mantra when it comes to structural steel for residential.

    Residential projects run on a budget. When they do, cost saving detials are usually missed by the engineer and architect.

    At Tek1, we see, check and recommend cost saving alternatives. 90% of the time our proposals are accepted saving cost to fabricator and builder.

    Our simple philosophy is , if it complicated to detail, it will be more expensive for fabricator. Keep it simple.

  • NO 11 CATHERINE PDE FRANKSTON

    NO 11 CATHERINE PDE FRANKSTON

    Author: RAJ (Arokiaraj Arputharaj)

  • UPGRADED ROCK REVETMENT AT FLIGHT DECK

    UPGRADED ROCK REVETMENT AT FLIGHT DECK

    Author: RAJ (Arokiaraj Arputharaj)

  • Detailing of Quakers Hill Secondary Switch Room

    Detailing of Quakers Hill Secondary Switch Room

    Introduction

    When it comes to construction, the integration of different materials and components is crucial for the success of any project. Steel detailing, particularly when combined with precast concrete, involves intricate planning and coordination. In the case of the Quakers Hill Secondary Switch Room, this integration posed potential challenges that were efficiently managed through the collaboration of our teams. This blog post explores how the synergy between steel and precast detailing led to a flawless execution of this project.

    The Challenge of Integrating Steel with Precast

    Typically, projects involving both steel and precast components require meticulous coordination. Each element, from the structural steel frames to the precast concrete panels, must align perfectly to ensure structural integrity and aesthetic coherence. The complexity increases as each contractor brings their own schedules, specifications, and work processes.

    Coordination with Precast Contractors

    In many projects, coordinating with precast contractors can be time-consuming. Differences in detailing standards, communication gaps, and timing issues often lead to delays and errors. The precision required in such tasks cannot be understated, as even minor misalignments can lead to significant problems down the line.

    The Tek1 Advantage

    For the Quakers Hill Secondary Switch Room project, our in-house team, Tek1 Precast, handled both the steel and precast detailing. This unique setup provided several advantages.

    Streamlined Communication

    Having both detailing responsibilities under one roof significantly streamlined communication. The teams were able to work closely, share real-time updates, and make adjustments swiftly without the usual back-and-forth with external contractors.

    Enhanced Accuracy

    With Tek1 managing both components, the accuracy of the detailing process improved dramatically. The team used integrated models to ensure that all elements fit together perfectly, reducing the likelihood of errors during construction.

    Time Efficiency

    This coordination not only enhanced the quality of the output but also saved time. The project moved faster because there were fewer delays in communication and problem-solving. This efficiency is particularly crucial in projects with tight deadlines.

    Project Outcomes

    The Quakers Hill Secondary Switch Room project was completed with zero errors in the steel and precast detailing. This flawless execution can be attributed to the effective collaboration and expertise of the Tek1 team.

    Zero Error Delivery

    Achieving zero errors in a project of this complexity is a significant accomplishment. It speaks volumes about the precision and dedication of our team, and the benefits of having a unified detailing approach.

    Client Satisfaction

    The client was immensely satisfied with the outcome. The project not only met but exceeded their expectations in terms of quality, timing, and overall execution. This success has further solidified our reputation as a leader in integrated steel and precast detailing.

  • How I Saved My Clients $1,000,000: Woolooware Shores Design Review

    How I Saved My Clients $1,000,000: Woolooware Shores Design Review

    Issue Identified:

    During the drafting phase of a recent commercial project, I encountered a critical issue involving clashes between downpipes and structural steel due to insufficient space for hydraulic piping routing.

    Discovery and Verification:

    Upon receiving architectural and structural drawings, I began modelled the structure and identified conflicts where downpipes from the gutters intersected with structural steel members.

    Initial attempts to accommodate the pipes exposed them below the ceiling, prompting me to request further hydraulic and IFC models for verification.

    Refer attached Live Model Link:

    https://app32.connect.trimble.com/tc/api/2.0/s/R0fxCRQKZX0BeTwU7YcIZKG_SqdQgG2L4xi9bsUpwwTfHjCi30NREyFv03zEbvOd

    Client Response:

    Upon submitting an RFI, the client confirmed that hydraulic piping routing had not been adequately considered in the initial designs.

    This coordination oversight posed a significant risk to the project’s integrity.

    Solution Implemented:

    To address the issue without compromising building aesthetics, I proposed raising the roof by 300mm after consulting with the client, architect, structural engineer, and hydraulics engineer. This solution was agreed upon to prevent potential wastage (58 Tons for Each Buildings, which costs around $800000 for Main Steel alone. And if we include the Purlins, Erection and other inclusive charges on site, then it will be more than a million dollar loss for both the buildings) and ensure the project’s successful completion for both Buildings (Building-C & Building-D)

    Conclusion:

    We checked the design’s aspects in every possible way to make sure that there won’t be any loss by any means to our clients.

  • PLATFORM EXTENSION

    PLATFORM EXTENSION

    Author: RAJ (Arokiaraj Arputharaj)