Category: Projects

  • A Practical Guide for Australian Steel Projects

    A Practical Guide for Australian Steel Projects

    This article provides an overview of the important Australian Standards for steel detailing and serves as a practical guide for steel detailing projects in Australia.

    Australian steel detailing requires more than accurately modelling beams, columns, plates and connections.

    In addition, a professional steel detailer needs to understand the project documentation and the applicable Australian Standards.These standards provide an important technical framework for structural steelwork, fabrication, erection and access systems.

    However, standards should always be considered together with the project’s structural drawings, specifications, contract documents and other requirements.

    Therefore, understanding the applicable standards is an important part of producing accurate, coordinated and practical steel detailing documentation.

    In particular, For steel detailing projects, several standards are particularly important, including AS 4100, AS/NZS 3678, AS/NZS 3679.1, AS/NZS 1163, AS/NZS 5131, AS 1657 and AS 1428.1:2021.

    1. AS 4100 – Steel Structures

    AS 4100 – Steel Structures is one of the primary standards used for structural steelwork in Australia. The current edition is AS 4100:2020.

    Furthermore, standards Australia describes AS 4100:2020 as an important standard for the Australian steel sector and identifies it alongside AS/NZS 5131 as key guidance for structural steelwork.

    In particular, AS 4100 is particularly important when interpreting structural design information.

    Therefore, a detailer does not normally perform the structural engineer’s design, but needs to understand the design requirements sufficiently to produce accurate fabrication and erection documentation.

    Typical detailing considerations include:

    In addition, the structural engineer’s drawings and specifications remain the primary design inputs.

    Finally, the detailer’s responsibility is to accurately translate those requirements into constructible steelwork.

    2. AS/NZS 3678 – Structural Steel: Hot-Rolled Plates

    AS/NZS 3678 covers structural steel, including hot-rolled plates, floorplates and slabs.

    Furthermore, standards Australia identifies it as one of the key structural steel standards published as part of its steel-sector standards work program.

    In particular, This standard is important when specifying and detailing fabricated steel components such as:

    When preparing shop drawings, the steel grade specified by the engineer should be clearly identified.

    In addition, the detailer should also ensure that the material description used in the drawings and MTO corresponds with the project requirements.

    For example, a plate shown as a particular grade on the structural drawings should not be changed to another grade simply because the alternative material is readily available.

    3. AS/NZS 3679.1 – Hot-Rolled Bars and Sections

    Australian steel projects commonly use hot-rolled sections such as universal beams, universal columns and angles.

    AS/NZS 3679.1 – Structural steel, Part 1: Hot-rolled bars and sections is therefore highly relevant to steel detailing.

    During modelling and detailing, the detailer should verify:

    Furthermore, accurate member identification is especially important in Tekla Structures because incorrect profiles or grades can flow through to fabrication drawings, NC files, MTO reports and material schedules.

    4. AS/NZS 1163 – Cold-Formed Structural Steel Hollow Sections

    Hollow sections are widely used in Australian construction for columns, beams, frames, handrails, balustrades and miscellaneous steelwork.

    In particular, AS/NZS 1163 covers cold-formed structural steel hollow sections.

    Common hollow-section profiles include:

    • SHS – Square Hollow Sections
    • RHS – Rectangular Hollow Sections
    • CHS – Circular Hollow Sections

    During the detailing process, it is important to correctly represent the section size and wall thickness specified by the engineer.

    For example, an SHS column specified as SHS150 × 6 should not be modelled as SHS150 × 9 unless the change has been formally approved.

    Furthermore, this is particularly important when steel members are connected to windows, doors, precast elements, concrete walls or architectural features where dimensional clearances are critical.

    5. AS/NZS 5131 – Fabrication and Erection of Structural Steelwork

    One of the most important standards for the fabrication and erection stage is AS/NZS 5131 – Structural steelwork – Fabrication and erection.

    Furthermore, standards Australia explains that AS/NZS 5131 covers areas including fabrication, bolting and welding, surface preparation, corrosion protection, painting, galvanizing, site erection and modification of steelwork.

    In particular, this standard is particularly relevant to the information shown on shop drawings.

    Therefore, A professional steel detailer should consider fabrication and erection requirements when producing drawings, including:

    Fabrication

    Firstly, Drawings should provide sufficient information for the fabricator to manufacture the component correctly.

    This may include:

    Erection

    In addition, Steelwork must also be practical to assemble on site.

    Detailers should consider:

    However, a connection that looks acceptable on a computer model may still be difficult or impossible to install on site.

    Therefore, Good detailing requires an understanding of both fabrication and erection.

    6. AS 1657 – Fixed Platforms, Walkways, Stairways and Ladders

    AS 1657 is particularly important for industrial steelwork, access platforms, stairs, ladders, walkways and handrails.

    The standard addresses fixed means of access and safe working areas, including platforms, walkways, stairways and fixed ladders.

    For steel detailers, this can affect many components, including:

    When detailing stairs and handrails, the detailer must carefully check the project requirements and applicable standard requirements rather than relying on assumptions from previous projects.

    Important items to verify include:

    The architectural drawings, structural drawings, specifications and project requirements should all be coordinated before finalising the detailing.

    7. AS 1428.1:2021 – Design for Access and Mobility

    AS 1428.1:2021 provides design requirements for access and mobility in new building work. In particular, it covers requirements that can affect accessible paths, ramps, stairs, landings, handrails, circulation spaces and other accessibility-related elements.

    For steel detailers, this standard can be relevant when detailing commercial building stairs, ramps, handrails, balustrades, platforms and other steelwork that forms part of an accessible path of travel.

    During the detailing process, the architectural and engineering drawings should be checked carefully for accessibility requirements. For example, dimensions, clearances, handrail arrangements, ramp and landing requirements may need to be coordinated with the structural steelwork.

    In addition, the detailer should coordinate the steelwork with architectural layouts and project specifications to avoid conflicts with doors, walls, finishes and other building elements.

    However, the steel detailer should not independently determine accessibility compliance. Instead, the applicable project requirements, architectural documentation, NCC requirements and relevant engineering information should be followed.

    Therefore, where AS 1428.1:2021 applies to the project, its requirements should be considered during the steel detailing and coordination process.

    8. AS/NZS 5131 and the Importance of Steel Detailing

    Australian steel detailing is closely connected to fabrication and erection.

    Before finalising the steelwork, several practical questions should be considered:

    These questions can prevent costly fabrication changes and site modifications.

    AS/NZS 5131 provides a framework for fabrication and erection practices, making coordination between engineering, detailing, fabrication and erection particularly important.

    9. Australian Standards and Tekla Structures

    Modern steel detailing is often completed using 3D modelling software such as Tekla Structures.

    However, software does not automatically guarantee compliance with Australian Standards.

    For this reason, The detailer still needs to interpret the project documentation and apply the correct requirements.

    10. Coordination Between Architectural and Structural Drawings

    One of the most common challenges in Australian steel detailing is the difference between architectural and structural information.

    Typical discrepancies include:

    Therefore, the steel detailer should identify these discrepancies during the checking stage.

    An effective RFI should clearly state:

    As a result, this approach reduces assumptions and helps maintain a clear record of design decisions.

    11. MTO and Material Identification

    Australian steel detailing is not complete when the 3D model is finished.

    In addition, The model must also produce accurate fabrication information and material quantities.

    The MTO/BOM should correctly identify:

    However, incorrect modelling can result in incorrect MTO quantities and fabrication information.Therefore, model checking should be performed before issuing the final material report.

    12. Common Steel Detailing Mistakes

    Some common problems encountered in Australian steel detailing include:

    Incorrect steel grade

    Incorrect member size

    Missing connection information

    Poor bolt access

    Architectural conflicts

    Missing site information

    Unapproved design changes

    13. The Role of a Professional Australian Steel Detailer

    A professional steel detailer acts as an important link between engineering design and steel fabrication.

    Therefore, the role involves much more than simply drawing steel members.

    For this reason, A competent detailer should be able to:

    Conclusion

    Australian steel detailing requires a combination of technical knowledge, practical fabrication experience, attention to detail and understanding of Australian Standards.

    In Particularly the Standards such as AS 4100, AS/NZS 3678, AS/NZS 3679.1, AS/NZS 1163, AS/NZS 5131, AS 1657 and AS 1428.1:2021 provide important references for different aspects of structural steelwork.

    However, standards should not be viewed in isolation.

    Therefore, The successful steel projects depend on coordination between the structural engineer, architect, steel detailer, fabricator and erector.

    The goal of professional steel detailing is simple:

    Create accurate, clear and buildable steelwork information that can be safely fabricated, delivered and erected on site.

    Finally, for current editions and official information, always refer to the applicable project specifications and the official Standards Australia catalogue rather than relying on outdated or unofficial copies of standards.

    Read more Tekla tips and technical guides on our Blog

  • Tekla Part Mark Issue with 1° Rotated Slotted Holes

    Tekla Part Mark Issue with 1° Rotated Slotted Holes

    This article explains the Tekla Part Mark Issue with 1° Rotated Slotted Holes and provides a practical solution.

    One common issue in Tekla Structures is assigning the same part mark to different-looking plates.

    This occurs when two plates have identical dimensions, thickness, material, and slotted hole size.

    One plate contains a standard horizontal slotted hole.

    The other plate has the same slot rotated by only 1°.

    Although the slot orientations differ, Tekla evaluates both plates using its 1 mm geometry tolerance.

    The 1° rotation creates a geometric difference within this tolerance.

    Therefore, Tekla considers both plates identical.

    As a result, Tekla automatically assigns the same part mark.

    The Tekla Part Mark Issue with 1° Rotated Slotted Holes occurs because Tekla compares geometry using its default tolerance.

    Please see the attached snapshot. Tekla is assigning different part marks to plates even though the only difference is that the slots are rotated by 1°. This results in additional time and cost for both the detailing and fabrication processes.

    This behavior can create confusion during detailing and fabrication.

    Detailers may expect different part marks because the slot directions are different.

    Fabricators may struggle to identify the correct plate for each connection.

    The issue can also affect CNC data generation.

    Quality inspections may become more difficult.

    Site assembly can also be affected when slot orientation is important.

    Solution to Resolve the Part Mark issue Between Plates with Horizontal Slots and 1° Rotated Slotted Holes

    Understanding the Tekla Part Mark Issue with 1° Rotated Slotted Holes helps detailers avoid unnecessary part variations.

    A simple solution is to standardize the slot geometry.

    Avoid creating separate plates with slightly rotated slots.

    Instead, use a larger diameter horizontal slot for all similar plates.

    The larger diameter slot accommodates the required installation tolerance for the 1° Rotated Slotted Holes.

    Every similar plate then shares the same geometry.

    All plates also receive the same part mark by design.

    This approach removes unnecessary part variations.

    It also maintains the required functionality and installation fit.

    By following this method, you can permanently resolve the Tekla Part Mark Issue with 1° Rotated Slotted Holes.

    Please see the attached snapshot. When comparing the overall height of the standard horizontal slot with the slot rotated by 1°, there is only a 1 mm difference. Therefore, we can increase the standard horizontal slot diameter by 1 mm so that the same slot size can be used for both situations. This will allow us to assign a single part mark to all identical plates, simplifying both the detailing and fabrication processes.

    Standardizing slotted holes provides several additional benefits.

    It reduces the number of unique parts in the model.

    It simplifies detailing and drawing production.

    Fabrication becomes easier and more consistent.

    CNC programming also becomes simpler.

    The risk of manufacturing errors is reduced.

    Assembly errors are less likely to occur.

    Inventory management also becomes easier.

    Fewer unique plate types need to be tracked.

    This method is considered a best practice whenever extra slot tolerance is acceptable.

    Always verify that the larger diameter slot meets project requirements.

    Confirm compliance with engineering specifications before implementation.

    Also ensure the connection design remains unchanged.

    Using standardized slots creates cleaner Tekla models.

    It improves fabrication efficiency

    and reduces unnecessary detailing work.

    also eliminates part mark conflicts caused by minor slot rotations.

    By following this method, you can permanently resolve the Tekla Part Mark Issue with 1° Rotated Slotted Holes.

    Key Benefits

    • Eliminates duplicate part mark issues.
    • Standardizes plate geometry and fabrication.
    • Reduces the number of unique plate types.
    • Simplifies detailing and CNC programming.
    • Improves manufacturing efficiency.
    • Prevents confusion during production and assembly.
    • Helps maintain a cleaner and more consistent Tekla model.

    We hope this guide helps you solve the Tekla Part Mark Issue with 1° Rotated Slotted Holes in your future Tekla projects.

    Read more Tekla tips and technical guides on our Blog

  • Park Street-L7 Framing

    Park Street-L7 Framing

    Expert Detailing of high end Residential Buildings

    Longstanding Client puts their faith again in Tek1 – and we deliver with NIL errors and smooth project management.

    (more…)

    Expert Detailing of high end Residential Buildings

    Longstanding Client puts their faith again in Tek1 – and we deliver with NIL errors and smooth project management.

    (more…)

    Expert Detailing of high end Residential Buildings

    Longstanding Client puts their faith again in Tek1 – and we deliver with NIL errors and smooth project management.

    (more…)
  • Complex Tekla Model – Emu in the Sky

    Complex Tekla Model – Emu in the Sky

    The Client

    Chess Industries was the client here. We were ably guided by Mohan and Mike on this project. We also put in our two cents worth cutting costs, eleminating problems before they crystallized.

    Jigs

    The jigs and tooling required was thought about even before we started. We have proposed certain tooling, which Chess have made some slight modifications. The tooling was part of the modelling, which simplified the fabrication of the entire job.

    Connection Design

    We have taken the concept design. Identified problems with the design which could make fabrication erection extremely difficult. Chalked out certain proposals. Mohan and Mike expanded on our ideas came out with a proposal which all were happy to work with. The result is easy fabrication and assembly.

    Tekla Model

    You can view the trimble connect Tekla Model at this link

    Emu in the Sky

  • Steel Detailing Projects | Melbourne | Sydney | WA

    Steel Detailing Projects | Melbourne | Sydney | WA

    • Project :Audi Centre – Myaree

    • Expert Steel Detailer looks beyond Structural Drawings

      Expert Steel Detailer looks beyond Structural Drawings

    • Create customised short cut to start TeklaStructures

    • Steel Fabrication Drawing

  • Ringwood Fire Station

    Ringwood Fire Station

  • pedestrian over pass

    Bendigo Pedestrian over pass

    Just revisiting some old projects. This project was fabricated by Third angle, Detailed by Tek1. One of the early pedestrian bridges detailed by Tek1.

    Many more followed after this.

    Bendigo pedestrian Bridge
  • TYPES OF MODEL VIEWERS FORMAT , PURPOSE AND ITS BENFITS

    A. IFC Mode

    Industry Foundation Classes (IFC) is an open file format developed by Building Smart Alliance. It is an international data exchange standard for exchanging building information across different software platforms. An IFC Model is just a model of a building or a construction project with all geometric, structural, and semantic information.

    Key Features of IFC Models:

    • Open Standard: IFC is vendor-independent, i.e., any software that supports it can be accessed, without regard for the vendor.
    • Static Data Exchange: It is mostly utilized for data exchange between software tools, data import, and export. For instance, an architect can create a model using Revit and export it as an IFC file, which can then be imported into structural engineering software like Tekla or SAP2000.
    • Limitation of Real-Time Coordination: IFC files are representations of the model at a specific moment. Changes in one application are not duplicated in another except where the file is re-exported and re-imported.
    • Use Cases:
    • Exchange of models between stakeholders with various software.
    • Ensuring interoperability in interdisciplinary projects (e.g., construction, engineering, and architecture).

    Advantages of IFC Models:

    • Encourages collaboration and interoperability in BIM workflows.
    • Reduces errors by making sure all stakeholders are working from the same information.
    • Allows clash detection and coordination between different disciplines.

    B.  Live Link Model Viewer

                      A Live Link Model Viewer is software that enables real-time sharing and visualization of BIM models on various software platforms. Unlike IFC models, which are pre-exported static files, a Live Link Model Viewer enables multiple users to work on the same model at the same time using different software programs. Common examples of Live Link Model Viewers are:

    Revit Live: A cloud-based collaboration platform by Autodesk.

    Trimble Connect: A BIM data management and sharing tool.

    Key Features of Live Link Model Viewers:

    1. Real-Time Collaboration: One software application’s changes are reflected immediately in the model viewer and other linked applications.
    • Dynamic Data Sharing: Unlike static IFC files, Live Link Model Viewers offer dynamic, real-time linking between software applications.
    • Multi-User Collaboration: Multiple stakeholders can view and edit one model at the same time even though they are in different software.
    • Use Cases:
    • Real-time collaboration among architects, engineers, and contractors.
    • Collaborative design review and clash detection.
    • Smooth communication between teams working on different software platforms.

    Advantages of Live Link Model Viewer Benefits:

    • Make collaboration more effective and faster.
    • Eliminate the need for repeated file imports and exports.
    • Enhance accuracy by getting the entire team to work on the current version of the model.

  • How TEK1 Solved the Complicated Star Node Puzzle in Great EMU in the Sky

    How TEK1 Solved the Complicated Star Node Puzzle in Great EMU in the Sky

    At TEK1, we believe great detailing is more than just precision—it’s about understanding real-world challenges and turning complexity into clarity.

    The Challenge

    The Great EMU in the Sky project presented one of the most unique and technically demanding structures we’ve ever worked on—a 30-metre-wide globe made up of 128 intricate “star nodes” connecting the bracing members.

    These nodes weren’t ordinary joints. Each featured 5 or 6 connection points and came in three different CHS sizes, with every arm set at unique, non-repeating angles.

    For the fabrication team, this posed a significant challenge:

    • 128 Complex Star Nodes, each with custom angles
    • Inconsistent geometries
    • Time-consuming and difficult to fabricate accurately

    Even with precise 3D modelling, the practicality of fabrication was proving to be a serious bottleneck. Something had to change.

    The Turning Point

    That’s when TEK1 took the initiative.

    Rather than simply delivering a model and walking away, we engaged directly with the fabricator to understand the issue from their perspective. We realized that even the most accurate detailing wasn’t enough—what the team needed was smarter, fabrication-friendly solutions.

    The Solution

    Our detailing team re-engineered how the star nodes were documented, presented, and ultimately fabricated. Key solutions included:

    • Custom fabrication jig design: We developed a dedicated jig that allowed star nodes to be fabricated with greater ease and precision, regardless of the angle configuration.
    • Standardized node sub-groups: We grouped similar nodes together to reduce variation and streamline production.
    • Detailed templates: For common angle types, we provided accurate templates to guide fabrication.
    • Visual fabrication aids: Clear drawings showing exact cuts, welds, and orientations for every node.

    The Result

    • Faster fabrication times
    • 🎯 Improved accuracy and alignment
    • 🔁 Reduced rework and error rates
    • 🤝 Stronger collaboration between design and workshop teams

    Most importantly, the fabricators were able to work with confidence, knowing each node would come together exactly as intended.

    Taking Detailing to the Next Level

    This project reinforced one of TEK1’s core values: true excellence in detailing comes not just from precision—but from empathy. When we truly understand the needs of the people building the structure, we unlock practical, buildable solutions.

    The Great EMU in the Sky is more than a globe—it’s a powerful example of what happens when detailers and fabricators work together as one team.

    📢 Call to Action:

    🚀 Have a complex structure or fabrication challenge? Partner with TEK1—where technical expertise meets buildability.