Author: Ganesh Kumar

  • 280-George street cladding

    TEK1 completed a cladding project for a prominent organization in Australia. The goal was to provide claddings to buildings for aesthetic purposes. Apart from that, the client also wants us to detail handrails & glass balustrades for the stairs.

  • Park Street-L3 Framing

    Park Street-L3 Framing

    Shop Drawings Residence

    Read More: Park Street-L3 Framing
    Steel Detailing |NSW| Australia
    Steel Detailing |NSW| Australia

    Steel Detaling for Residence | Sydney

  • Esplanade Brighton canopy

    Esplanade Brighton canopy

    TEK1 completed a canopy project for a prominent organization in Australia. The goal was to provide detailed support for steelwork canopies.

  • Handling Complex Geometry – Ribbon

    Handling Complex Geometry – Ribbon

    Recently, we were awarded a project to detail a curved section on the bridge for a reputed organization in Australia. The geometry involved presented some unique challenges.

    From the elevation, the structure followed a non-linear zig-zag curvature, creating a dynamic and aesthetically driven form.

    (more…)
  • TEK1’s Steel Detailing for Sydney Metro – Resolving Design Challenges – 8

    TEK1’s Steel Detailing for Sydney Metro – Resolving Design Challenges – 8

    In this blog, we share a proposal we made to the builder to make installation easier on-site.

    In the OTE platform steel, we provided a PSD beam (OTB5) to support the platform screen doors below. These beams will later need to coordinate with the door manufacturer’s system.

    However, in practice, structural steel is rarely placed in the exact designed level due to factors like concrete alignment, mill tolerances, and site conditions. If the beam is installed as per the design without adjustment options, it may not match the required level for the doors.

    To solve this, we proposed adding packer plates so the PSD beam level can be adjusted during installation.

    The client accepted our proposal, and this solution will make the erection and alignment process much easier on site.

  • The Importance of Roof and Purlin Alignment in Detailing


    In Australian steel detailing, understanding roof and purlin specifications is essential for delivering precise and efficient designs. In this blog, I’ll share an experience highlighting the significance of addressing roof slope issues during detailing.


    The Issue


    In a structural drawing, the purlins were shown running north-south, which suggested that the roof slope would be east-west (since purlins are always perpendicular to the roof slope). However, when we reviewed the architectural drawings, the roof slope was indicated as running north-south—a direct contradiction.

    The Resolution


    We raised the issue with the client, who confirmed that the architectural drawings superseded the structural ones. Following this clarification, updated drawings were issued, with the roof slope correctly aligned in the east-west direction.


    Key Takeaways

    • Cross-Check Drawings: Always verify alignment between structural and architectural drawings, especially for critical elements like roof slopes.
    • Communicate Early: Raising discrepancies early saves time and prevents costly rework.
    • Stay Updated: Ensure you work with the most recent drawings to avoid confusion.

    Roof and purlin alignment might seem straightforward, but even small errors can have significant implications. Attention to detail and proactive communication are key to successful detailing.

  • Hammond care pergola

    TEK1 completed a Pergola project for a prominent organization in Australia. The goal was to provide detailed support steelwork for Pergolas.

  • TEK1’s Steel Detailing for Sydney Metro – Resolving Design Challenges – 7

    TEK1’s Steel Detailing for Sydney Metro – Resolving Design Challenges – 7

    In this blog, I’d like to share an issue we faced while detailing Platform Screen Door (PSD) support beams in a metro station project.

    Our scope was to provide structural beams to support the platform screen doors. The design also required stiffeners in these beams for structural strength.

    The Issue We Identified

    Before placing the stiffeners as per the design, we reviewed how the door frames would connect to the beams. During this check, we realized that the stiffeners could clash with the door frame supports.

    As expected, when we reviewed the door frame support details, the clash became clear.

    We raised this issue with the relevant team, and they advised us to modify the stiffener size so it would not interfere with the door frame supports.

    As detailers, we shouldn’t just place elements exactly as shown in the design. We must also think about how other components will connect and function.

    This is especially important when our steel supports secondary steel, equipment, or framing systems. A little extra attention during detailing can prevent major issues during installation.

  • The Importance of Bolt Placement and Edge Distance in Detailing

    The Importance of Bolt Placement and Edge Distance in Detailing


    Detailers must exercise caution when working with bolts and edge distances, as these are common areas for errors in structural detailing. In this blog, I’ll share my experience with a bolt edge distance issue and how it was resolved.


    The Scenario


    In a recent project, the design required a UB (Universal Beam) to sit on a 200mm-thick concrete wall, secured with M20 chemset bolts.

    Upon review, it became clear this setup wasn’t feasible:

    • Anchor Distance: M20 bolts require a minimum anchor distance of 120mm.
    • Edge Distance: A minimum edge distance of 80mm is necessary.

    Additionally, the beam wasn’t centered on the wall, further complicating the bolt placement.


    The Proposed Solution

    To address the issue, I proposed welding plates to the bottom of the beam. This adjustment allowed the beam to be bolted to the side of the wall rather than its top.


    The Engineer’s Feedback


    After reviewing the proposal, the engineer suggested a simpler solution: using a single row of bolts instead of two. This change eliminated the edge distance problem.Engineer mentioned that one row of bolt is enough for this beam.

    In this project, the engineer did not accept our proposal, as they determined that the beam does not require that level of support. However, as detailers, it is our responsibility to highlight the issue and propose suitable solutions.